DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 ยง. COURTHOUSE ROAD
ARLINGTON, VA 22204
DJC
Docket No. 12699-11
13 Mar 12
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
12 March 2012. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQMC Memo 1040 MMEA dtd
21 Feb 12, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
we
Executive iE
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00124 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00994 12
& three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 09807 11
9807-11 12 Mar 12 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552: A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00236 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 February 2012. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1780 PERS-314B of 8 Feb 12, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 12443 11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 10126 11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 11905 11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05852-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 March 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO Memo 7220 Ser N130D2/12U0862 dtd 2 Jul 12, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05161-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 July 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 03803 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 October 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...